Friday, April 27, 2012


One of the largest challenges the collection box operators are currently contending with are the plethora of upcoming city regulations. Goodwill Industries, and to a lesser extent Salvation Army as well have been actively lobbying various city officials in a number of cities for some time now to paint collection boxes as something unnecessary that needs to be banned from our cities.

The donation box concept is based on convenience on one end and the ever increasing demand for used clothing on the domestic and international markets on the other end. Campus California’s donation boxes provide the public with an easy and convenient way of donating unwanted items that can be (fairly) easily delivered to various markets, effectively returning them into use as ready products (wearable clothing) or industrial feedstock (rags, shredded/unusable pieces) materials that would otherwise be landfilled. The periodically recurring complaint about “taking away” donations from other charities (read: Goodwill) is baseless once one looks on the data from the EPA and a number of waste characterization studies. These show that not only we are recycling only about 15 % of all textiles disposed in the US, but the overall volume of textiles in the waste stream is increasing as well, topping 13 million tons in 2010. 
In short, the focus should be on increasing public participation in the recycling programs that are out there to get people to recycle more since this is clearly not a zero sum game with the textile diversion numbers being where they are.

There are a few bad apples in this industry, just as in any other, but not every solar company is called Solyndra! The fact is that you can usually tell a sensible regulation by the support from all sides. Just as AB 918, setting disclosure requirements on collection boxes, had the support of all parties, despite being introduced and sponsored by Goodwill. On the other hand, the Sacramento city regulation from 2010 had the opposition of all collection box operators in the city, but the support of the Goodwill CEO and one of the highest paid lobbyists in the state presenting himself as “just a regular property owner”. As a result, there is widespread compliance with the state bill, at least amongst the honest box operators; but no legally placed boxes in Sacramento.

Sensible regulations governing the operating of textile collection boxes can be helpful for a city. Small enough permit fees and simple rules encourage compliance, help the city to maintain oversight and make enforcement easier. Drop off locations can get registered, so if any complaint from the public comes in, the code enforcement knows exactly who does the box belong to. In fact one of the sources of frustration for operators that try to do the right thing is that all boxes just get thrown into the same bag, when there are a number of players on the field and not all of them care the same way for the boxes or any regulations for that matter.

Understandably the cities are also looking at boxes as a possible revenue stream in the form of permit and other fees, but sometimes they get a little carried away. Imposing a $2-3 000 fee for a single location, as some places require, and a sufficiently complicated approval process to back the fee up (sometimes with public hearings and planning commission approvals) makes it impossible for the operator to actually comply with the rules and make any surplus at the same time. The result is that the unscrupulous companies will drop their boxes anyway, the city has to pay for enforcement from other sources or not enforce the violations (just ask Richmond how much luck they had in getting rid of the blue clothing boxes) and the people who wanted to comply with the rules lose out on the market.

Clothing donation boxes are one of the few recycling activities that thrives only in full public view. This causes unease in some public officials; zoning administrators and others who wish to design every aspect of our cities to the last minute detail. A drop off box that “pops up” from one day to another (well, what does it take to place one? Put it on a truck and place it on a site, done. Really not a big project!) and can be moved away just as easily introduces almost an element of chaos, or life, or change. Cities often consider recycling to be dirty and unsightly and something to be hidden, tucked away in industrial parks, or maybe in the back parking lots of large shopping centers where many of the bottle-and-can buy-back centers are being pushed. 
We believe for the ideas of reuse and recycling to be firmly sitting on people’s minds and not slipping to the back burner; recycling activities must remain visible, right in front of our eyes as well, not hidden away.


Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Earth Day 2012

Campus California was pleased to participate in Berkeley`s Earth Day on the 21st of April, 2012


A lot of people were interested to learn about our activities and in finding the nearest location to them

It was a very succesful event with all kinds of diffrent enviromental focus and people. Campus California was happy to be a part of it.